Two historians of 20th century domesticity in Canada give you the dish on CBC’s Back in Time for Dinner!
Welcome back to part three of our mini-series reviewing CBC’s new show, Back in Time for Dinner!
The Unwritten Rules of History
Two historians of 20th century domesticity in Canada give you the dish on CBC’s Back in Time for Dinner!
Welcome back to part three of our mini-series reviewing CBC’s new show, Back in Time for Dinner!
Co-authored with Stephanie Pettigrew, digital goddess.
Special thanks to Krista McCracken for the information on web archiving!
We all have our #TeachingFail moments. One of Andrea’s most memorable moments happened when she was in the middle of a lecture on World War II. She had planned to show an adorable clip from CBC from the 60th anniversary of VE Day celebrations, which told the love story between a Canadian soldier and his Dutch bride who met during the storied Summer of Love (the 1945 version, not the 1969 version). She was super excited, since (if you can’t tell), she loved the clip. But it wouldn’t load. What’s worse, when she tried Google, it told her that the link no longer existed. Andrea was aghast. And that’s how she learned that CBC only keeps its online videos available for six years. While she was able to later access it through their CAMPUS service, her ability to play it in a classroom now depends on whether or not the institution she works for has a subscription.
This brings us to our point: we need to start thinking about digital permanence and historical digital projects. Archivists and historians have bemoaned the digital age for as long as we can remember, quite rightly. When it comes to the amazing online resources that historians have created over the last ten years, few of us think about the long-term viability of these digital projects. For the most part, we launch an online collection of material, and then think that our work is done. The site chugs along well for a while, and, as time moves on, so does the digital work, until the digital project becomes increasingly difficult to use and/or obsolete, before vanishing into the interwebs of time. So in today’s blog post, we’re going to do a few things: talk about the issue of historical digital projects and digital longevity; make the argument that we need to be better about ensuring that our work remains accessible; discuss some of the ways you can ensure that your digital project has longevity; and provide suggestions on what to do when your favourite digital project dies.
*To be clear, by digital projects we are referring to any type of online entity, including, but not limited to: websites, blogs, digital archives, online exhibits, interactive maps, and so on.
Two historians of 20th century domesticity in Canada give you the dish on CBC’s Back in Time for Dinner!
Welcome back to part three of our mini-series reviewing CBC’s new show, Back in Time for Dinner!
Note from Andrea: This post was originally supposed to go up in April, but as many of you know, my husband was hospitalized for Crohn’s Disease around that time. While we didn’t know it at the time, the entire ordeal lasted two months and involved two operations. And towards the end of that period, I started a six-week condensed summer course. It is only thanks to the help of many people that I was able to keep everything going. I’d like to especially thank Anne Dance, Catherine Ulmer, Stacey Zembrzycki, Claire Campbell, Danielle Lorenz, Krystal Raven, Krista McCracken, Jenny Ellison, Jessica DeWitt, Maddie Knickerbocker, Shannon Stettner, Lynne Marks, and Sarah York-Bertram for their support during this entire ordeal. I would also like to thank all of the wonderful people who reached out to me during this time, including all of the lovely people who asked how Lee and I were doing at the CHA. Special thanks to the wonderful contributors who moonlit on the blog while I was away, including Sarah York-Bertram, the CHA Reads contributors (Krista McCracken, Ian Jesse, Carly Ciufo, Dan Horner, and Carmen Nielson), Rachel Bryant, Andrew Nurse, Heather Green, and Shannon Stettner. And of course, none of this would have been possible without Stephanie Pettigrew, who basically took over managing the website while I was away. Seriously, you folks are all awesome, and I will never be able to fully express my gratitude. Finally, extra special thanks to Stéphanie Verner, Sylvie Raymond, and Karen Ryan for being so patient with this long-overdue blog post! As for Lee, he’s been home for a month now, is recovering well, and is overwhelmed by your good thoughts.
I’ve always been fascinated by historical mysteries. I was the history dork who actually signed up for archaeology classes in elementary school (such as they were), and spent hours pouring over mysteries like Tutankhamun’s curse and the fate of the Maya. The Franklin Expedition was one of the those mysteries, and, like so many others, I never thought it would be solved.
If you’ve been following this blog for a while, you know that we have extensively covered both the rediscovery of the HMS Erebus and HMS Terror, as well as the work done to bring the story of the Franklin Expedition to life in museum exhibitions in the UK and Canada. So when I was offered the chance to interview the curator of the new Franklin Expedition exhibit (say that ten times fast) at the Canadian Museum of History, Dr. Karen Ryan, you won’t be surprised to learn that I jumped on this opportunity. As is the case with the blog post on the Hockey exhibition, this blog post is the result of my conversation with Ryan, and provides a behind-the-scenes look at the Franklin Expedition exhibit and Ryan’s work on the project.
*Special thanks to Stephanie Pettigrew, Stéphanie Verner, Sylvie Raymond, and the Canadian Museum of History for arranging this interview, Jenny Ellison for her assistance and fantastic suggestions for questions, and Karen Ryan for agreeing to speak with me!
**Please note that all images are courtesy of the Canadian Museum of History, and used with permission.
Karen Ryan joined the Museum’s staff in 2010, and her curatorial responsibilities touch on the prehistory and history of Canada’s North. She collaborates on land claims and repatriation requests, and is currently researching the ill-fated Northwest Passage expedition commanded by Sir John Franklin in 1845.
Dr. Ryan has conducted archeological fieldwork throughout Nunavut, Nunavik and Nunatsiavut, as well as in Newfoundland, and has published articles on the social and cultural prehistory of the Canadian Arctic, traditional ideology and shamanism, hunter-gatherer domestic architecture and the application of contemporary technologies to archaeological practices.
Dr. Ryan holds an Honours BA in Anthropology and History from Memorial University of Newfoundland, an MA in Anthropology from McMaster University and a PhD in Anthropology from the University of Toronto.
Two historians of 20th century domesticity in Canada give you the dish on CBC’s Back in Time for Dinner!
Welcome back to part three of our mini-series reviewing CBC’s new show, Back in Time for Dinner!
Note From Andrea: Thank you all so much for your patience with me while I finish up this condensed summer course! Our last special blog post comes from none other than Shannon Stettner! I am so pleased to be able to share this post with you, since I think it is, unfortunately, extremely topical given events of the past few weeks. That, and Shannon is an extremely talented historian, as well as a wonderful friend. And she’s probably going to kill me for saying that. So I hope you enjoy this one as much as I did! And I’ll be back next week with a brand new post from me!
Shannon Stettner teaches in the Women’s Studies Department at the University of Waterloo. Her research examines women’s abortion rights activism, reproductive justice, and public opinion on abortion in Canada. She is the editor of Without Apology: Writings on Abortion in Canada (Athabasca University Press), and co-editor of Transcending Borders: Abortion in the Past and Present (Palgrave MacMillan) and Abortion: History, Politics, and Reproductive Justice After Morgentaler (University of British Columbia Press). She is also a founding member of the Reproductive Activism and Abortion Research Network. Shannon tweets from @slstettner.
In this post, I would like to share some of the initial reactions to the Abortion Caravan in the immediate aftermath of the event.[1] I do so in light of recent conversations about civil disobedience, especially suggestions that there are right or wrong ways to protest.[2] After writing this piece, conversations about civility came to the fore and commentators have also offered ideas about “proper” ways to protest.[3] Arguments about the effectiveness of a particular tactic suggests that there is only one goal or outcome of an act of civil disobedience. But, the varied reactions to the Abortion Caravan suggest that there are multiple takeaways and when we judge an event as successful or not, we should be aware that the outcome observers may be focused on could well be a secondary (or even a non-) consideration for the organizers and participants. Change does not generally occur through a single act of protest. An event that isn’t “successful” or well received in one respect may still have a lot of value in another. What is valuable to remember is that it is through such actions that activists evolve and grow their messages and techniques.[4]
Two historians of 20th century domesticity in Canada give you the dish on CBC’s Back in Time for Dinner.
Welcome back to part two of our mini-series reviewing CBC’s new show, Back in Time for Dinner!
© 2024 Unwritten Histories
Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑